UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the CommissionOnly (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary |
☐ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
___________________
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To be held on February 14, 201815, 2023
___________________
To the Shareholders of
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Daily Journal Corporation (the “Company”) will be held virtually on Wednesday, February 14, 2018,15, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time,Time. Due to continued concerns for the health of our directors, officers and shareholders, we will not have an audience at the DoubleTreemeeting. Instead, CNBC will stream the event worldwide. You should visit their website at cnbc.com/DailyJournalMeeting on the day of the meeting. Our shareholders should send their questions to Becky Quick, a journalist at CNBC, who will then submit questions to members of the Board or Baker Tilly US, LLP, as appropriate. Please send questions by Hilton Hotel, Los Angeles Downtown, locatedFebruary 13, 2023 at 120 South Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time to the following email address: DailyJournalQuestions@CNBC.com. Given time constraints, we unfortunately anticipate that not all questions will be asked and answered at the Annual Meeting.
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to consider and vote upon the following matters, as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement which is attached hereto and incorporated herein:
(1) | Election of four members to the Board of Directors. |
(2) | Ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly US, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year. |
(3) | An advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation. |
(3) Such other matters as may properly come before the meeting.
(4) | An advisory vote on the frequency of holding an advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation. |
(5) | Such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. |
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on December 22, 201716, 2022 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABLITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 14, 201815, 2023
This Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the accompanying Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022 may be viewed and printed from the Company’s website at proxy.dailyjournal.com.
proxy.dailyjournal.com.
By Order of the Board of Directors | |
Michelle Stephens | |
Secretary |
December 28, 201730, 2022
___________________
IMPORTANT
SHAREHOLDERS WHO DO NOT EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON ARE URGED TO DATE, FILL IN, SIGN, AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
915 E. 1st Street
Los Angeles, California90012
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
February 14, 201815, 2023
Your proxy in the enclosed form is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually on February 14, 201815, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time at DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, Los Angeles Downtown, located at 120 South Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and at any adjournment thereof. Due to continued concerns for the health of our directors, officers and shareholders, we will not have an audience at the meeting. Instead, CNBC will stream the event worldwide. You should visit their website at cnbc.com/DailyJournalMeeting on the day of the meeting. Our shareholders should send their questions to Becky Quick, a journalist at CNBC, who will then submit questions to members of the Board or Baker Tilly US, LLP, as appropriate. Please send questions by February 13, 2023 at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time to the following email address: DailyJournalQuestions@CNBC.com. Given time constraints, we unfortunately anticipate that not all questions will be asked and answered at the Annual Meeting.
Each properly executed proxy received prior to the Annual Meeting will be voted as directed, but, if not otherwise specified, proxies will be voted (1) for the election of the four nominees for directors named in this Proxy Statement andto the Board of Directors, (2) to ratify the appointment of Squar MilnerBaker Tilly US, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.year, (3) in favor of the advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation and (4) in favor of continuing to hold the advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation once every three years. As to any other business which may properly come before the meeting and be submitted to a vote of shareholders, proxies received by the Board of Directors will be voted in accordance with the discretion of the holders thereof.
Each shareholder has the right to revoke hissuch shareholder’s proxy at any time before it is voted. A proxy may be revoked by filing with the Secretary of the Company at 915 E.1stE. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, a written revocation or a properly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by voting in person.date.
The Company will bear the cost it contracts for in the solicitation of proxies. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone, fax or e-mail by officers, directors and other employees of the Company (none of whom will receive additional compensation therefor). The Company will also request persons, firms and corporations holding shares in their names, or in the names of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send or cause to be sent proxy materials to, and obtain proxies from, such beneficial owners, and, on request, will reimburse such holders for their reasonable expenses in so doing.
The close of business on December 22, 201716, 2022 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. The only voting securities of the Company are the 1,380,7461,377,026 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the record date. A majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the record date must be represented in person or by proxy to constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. All shares represented in person or by proxy, regardless of the nature of the vote, the indication of abstention or the absence of a vote indication, including broker non-votes, will be counted to determine the number of shares represented at the meeting. This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being mailed to shareholders on or about December 28, 2017.30, 2022.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
(Item 1 on the Proxy Card)
The Bylaws of the Company permit from three to fiveseven members on the Board of Directors. Presently, fivefour directors serve on the Board. The directors are elected annually and serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and the election of their successors.
The independent members of the Board of Directors have nominated for election to the fiveBoard of Directors the four nominees listed below. Shareholders have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. This means that each shareholder has the right to cast a number of votes equal to hissuch shareholder’s number of shares of Common Stock multiplied by the number of directors to be elected, and to cast all of such votes for one nominee or distribute such votes among two or more nominees as he chooses.nominees. The right to vote cumulatively is dependent on a shareholder’s giving notice of hissuch shareholder’s intention to cumulate his votes either to an officer of the Company in writing 48 hours before the meeting or by an announcement during the meeting before the voting for directors commences. Once such notice is given, all other shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be without further notice entitled to cumulate their votes. Unless otherwise instructed, the persons named in the accompanying form of Proxy will vote the proxies for the five nominees listed below, reserving the right, however, to cumulate such votes and to distribute them among the nominees at their discretion.
Because this is an “uncontested” election in which there are four nominees for four seats on the Board of Directors, area director nominee shall be elected by a pluralityto the Board of Directors if the votes cast byin favor of his or her election exceed the shares entitled to vote thereon.votes cast against his or her election. Abstentions are not counted as votes cast in favor of any nominee.cast. Broker non-votes (which occur when a broker or nominee does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have discretion under applicable rules to direct the voting of the shares, such as in the election of directors) will not affect the outcome.
The Board of Directors of the Company does not contemplate that any of the following nominees will become unavailable prior to the meeting, but if any such persons should become unavailable, proxies will be voted for such other nominees as may be selected by the Company’sCompany’s independent directors.
Director Nominees
Below is certain information as of December 26, 2022 about each nominee for election to the four seats on the Company’s Board of Directors as of December 28, 2017:Directors:
Name | Age | Principal Occupation Last Five Years | ||
Charles T. Munger | 98 | Charles T. Munger |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| |
| 58 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |
| |||
|
|
Qualifications and Skills: Ms. Conlin graduated from Harvard Business School, and has decades of |
Name | Age | Principal Occupation Last Five Years | |
John B. Frank | 66 |
| |
|
|
Qualifications and Skills: Mr. Frank has extensive experience with business leadership, operations and finance, having served for | |
Steven Myhill-Jones | 47 | Steven Myhill-Jones has served as the Company’s Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer since March | |
| |||
Qualifications and |
Proxies given without instructions will be voted FOR the nominees listed above.
Besides Mr. Myhill-Jones, the Company’s only other executive officer is its Chief Financial Officer, Tu To, who serves as the principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Certain information about Ms. To as of December 26, 2022 is set forth below:
Tu To | 60 | Ms. To has been the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since March 2022. Prior to that, she served as its Vice President since September 2019, and its Controller since 1994. Ms. To began working for the Company in its accounting department in 1987. |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Guerin, KaufmanMunger and Wilcox areFrank and Ms. Conlin is “independent” in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). Accordingly, a majority of the members of the Board of Directors are independent, as required by NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(b)(1).
The Board of Directors has two standing committees: the audit committee and the compensation committee. Each committee both consistingconsists of Messrs. Guerin, KaufmanMunger and Wilcox.Frank and Ms. Conlin. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,2022, the Board of Directors held three meetings. Thefive meetings, the audit committee held two meetingsone meeting, and the compensation committee held one meeting during the fiscal year.three meetings. Each incumbent director attended all of the meetings of the Board and any committee of which he was a member.such meetings. The Company does not require its directors to attend the Annual Meetings of Shareholders. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held virtually with no audience, but allthe Company believes each of the Company’sthen-serving directors attendedparticipated in the 2017 Annual Meeting.virtual meeting.
Audit Committee
The audit committee was established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and is responsible for assisting the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities as they relate to the Company’s accounting policies, internal controls and financial reporting practices. The audit committee operates in accordance with a written charter that is not available on the Company’s website but that was previously attached as Appendix A to the Company’s proxy statement dated December 29, 2016.for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. GuerinFrank is an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is used in Item 407 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Guerin is independent even though he falls outside the “safe harbor” definition set forth in Rule 10A-3(e)(1)(ii) under the Exchange Act because he owns in excess of 10% of the Company’s common stock. Among other things, the Board considered Mr. Guerin’s history of service and the percentage of common stock held by others, and it determined that he is not an “affiliated person” of the Company who would be ineligible to serve on the audit committee. The Board of Directors believes that each of Messrs. Guerin, KaufmanMunger and Wilcox isFrank and Ms. Conlin are independent under NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2), meets the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and satisfies the other audit committee membership requirements specified in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee is responsible for determining the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and all of its other executive officers, if any.Chief Financial Officer. As required by NASDAQ Listing Rules, the compensation committee operates under a written charter that is not available on the Company’s website but that was previously attached as Appendix B to the Company’s proxy statement dated December 29, 2016. The compensation committee’s charter is not available onfor the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Neither of the Company’s website. The Company’s only executive officer, Gerald L. Salzman, does not determineofficers determines or recommendrecommends the amount or form of his or her own compensation or of any director’s compensation. The compensation committee relies on its own good judgment in carrying out its duties and does not waste shareholder money on compensation consultants. The compensation committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees as it deems appropriate.
Nominations
There is no standing nominating committee, but the Company’sCompany’s independent directors are responsible for selecting nominees for election to the Board of Directors. The Company believes that its independent directors are able to fully consider and select appropriate nominees for election to the Board without operating as a formal committee or pursuant to a written charter. For this same reason, the Company does not have a formal policy by which its shareholders may recommend director candidates, but the independent directors will certainly consider candidates recommended by shareholders.shareholders will certainly be considered. A shareholder wishing to submit such a recommendation should send a letter to the Secretary of the Company at 915 E. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Director Nominee Recommendation.” The letter must identify the author as a shareholder and provide a brief summary of the candidate’s qualifications, as well as contact information for both the candidate and the shareholder. At a minimum, candidates for election to the Board must meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Candidates should also have relevant business and financial experience, and they must be able to read and understand fundamental financial statements. Candidates recommended by shareholders will be evaluated in the same manner as candidates recommended by anyone else, although the independent directors nominating the slate may prefer candidates who are personally known to the existing directors and whose reputations are highly regarded. The independent directors will consider allAll relevant qualifications, as well as the needs of the Company in terms of compliance with NASDAQ listing standards and Securities and Exchange Commission rules.rules, will be considered.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
Separate individuals currently holdFor many decades, Mr. Munger served as Chairman of the positionsCompany, while Gerald L. Salzman served as its principal executive officer. But with Mr. Salzman’s retirement, the Company began its transition to a new generation of leadership, and Mr. Munger agreed with the Board of Directors given various circumstances it would be desirable to combine the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, andat least initially. Such a combination was intended to give the new principal executive officer unambiguous authority following Mr. Munger, who servesMunger’s retirement as Chairman is not an employee. As Chairman, Mr. Munger leadsand to consolidate operational leadership, at least in the Board of Directors and coordinatesnear-term period (which was the Board’s activities, including the setting of relevant agenda items for Board meetings (in consultation with Mr. Salzman, the Chief Executive Officer). The Company believes this structure provides an appropriate allocation of leadership responsibilities and an effective wayrationale for the Board to carry out its obligations on behalf of shareholders.
The“Interim CEO” designation). At the same time, the full Board of Directors is responsible for managing the material risks facing the Company. Certain oversight responsibilities that touch on the risks facing the Company have been delegated to the audit committee and compensation committee in the ordinary course, but Mr. Salzmanthe principal executive officer reports to the full Board, and the full Board participates in the discussion and management of any material risks. On an annual basis, and more frequently as deemed appropriate, the Board evaluates with Mr. Salzman the overall risks facing the Company, including risks to its business and to its internal operations, as well as possible actions that may be taken to address those risks. As described later in this Proxy Statement, the Company has designed its executive compensation program to align the interests of Mr. Salzmanthe principal executive officer with those of the shareholders, and the Company does not believe that its executive compensation arrangements, plans, programs and policies are likely to pose a material risk or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Shareholder Communication with the Board of Directors
Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board of Directors or with a particular director may send a letter to the Secretary of the Company at 915 E. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Shareholder-Board Communication” or “Shareholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a shareholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or just certain specified individual directors. The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. The Code of Ethics was attached as an exhibit to the Company’sCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.2020.
Related Person Transactions
In accordance with the audit committee’s charter, any related person transaction that the Company would be required to disclose pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K must be reviewed and approved by the audit committee. The audit committee also reviews and approves certain other transactions between the Company and related persons or their family members. The audit committee will approve transactions that it believes are in the best interests of shareholders using its judgment and based on the facts and circumstances of each situation.
The Company utilizes the software consulting services ofemploys James Brian Salzman and Jon Darin Salzman, the sonwho are sons of the Company's President,former Chief Executive Officer, Gerald L. Salzman. In fiscal 2017, he billedSalzman, who retired in March 2022, to do software services for the CompanyCompany. The aggregate compensation for the two of them was approximately $120,000 for about 1,850 hours of software consulting work, and aggregate payments are expected to be approximately the same amount$218,000 in fiscal 2018. The Company employs Riley Guerin, the son of the Company’s director2022 and Vice Chairman, J.P. Guerin. In$215,000 in fiscal 2017, the Company paid Riley compensation of approximately $175,000, and his2021. Their aggregate compensation is expected to be approximately $221,000 in fiscal 2023.
The Company also employs Hoa To and Ky To, the sister and brother of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Tu To. Hoa To works in the accounting department as Assistant Controller, and Ky To is the Company’s Information Technology Manager. In fiscal 2022, the two of them received aggregate compensation of $390,000, compared to $343,000 in fiscal 2021. In 2023, their aggregate compensation is expected to be at approximately the same amount of $175,000level as in fiscal 2018. Beginning September 2017, the Company has utilized the professional services of Elizabeth Dickinson, the daughter of J.P. Guerin. In fiscal 2017, she billed the Company approximately $1,000, and she is not expected to receive in excess of $120,000 during fiscal 2018. The audit committee approved Riley Guerin’s compensation and Elizabeth Dickinson’s consulting fees (without the participation of J.P. Guerin), and Jon Darin Salzman’s software consulting fees for fiscal 2017 and has approved them again for fiscal 2018.2022.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
All membersMaryjoe Rodriguez served on the Company’s Board of Directors from December 2021 until November 2022. She was also an employee of the Company. During fiscal 2022 and through the date of her departure from the Company in December 2022, she was paid a total of $739,000, consisting of her salary, severance and payout of units under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan for fiscal 2022. She received total compensation committee served throughoutof $465,000 in fiscal 2017,2021, and no member was part of a “compensation committee interlock” as defined in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. In addition, Mr. Salzman, our only executive officer,will not receive any compensation going forward. She did not serve asreceive separate compensation for her service on the Board of Directors.
Anti-Hedging Policy
The Board of Directors has adopted a director or memberpolicy that prohibits all officers, employees and directors of the compensation committeeCompany from engaging in any kind of another entityhedging transaction that would constitute a compensation committee interlock.could reduce or limit such person’s economic risk with respect to his or her holdings, ownership or interest in or to shares of the Company’s Common Stock or any compensatory awards that are based on the financial performance of the Company or its subsidiaries, or the market value of the Company’s Common Stock.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth compensation paid by the Company during the last threetwo fiscal years to Gerald L. Salzman, who is the onlyits current executive officers and its one former executive officer of the Company.who retired in March 2022.
Summary Compensation Table
Annual Executive Compensation in Fiscal 2012021 5– – 20120227
Fiscal Year | Salary | Bonus | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||
Steven Myhill-Jones | |||||||||||||||||
Interim Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | $ | 250,000* | $ | 80,000 | * | $ | --- | $ | 330,000 | * | ||||||
Tu To | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer | 2022 | 205,000 | 40,000 | 153,500 | 398,500 | ||||||||||||
2021 | 175,000 | 40,000 | 118,700 | 333,750 | |||||||||||||
Gerald L. Salzman | |||||||||||||||||
Former Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | 126,000 | --- | 847,320 | 973,320 | ||||||||||||
and Chief Financial Officer | 2021 | 250,000 | 400,000 | 703,000 | 1,353,000 |
* Represents the pro-rated portion of a $490,000 annual salary and a $160,000 annual bonus. Mr. Myhill-Jones began serving as Interim Chief Executive Officer on March 28, 2022.
Fiscal Year | Salary | Bonus | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(1) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Gerald L. Salzman | 2017 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 400,000 | $ | --- | $ | 650,000 | |||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer, President, | 2016 | 250,000 | 400,000 | --- | 650,000 | |||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary | 2015 | 250,000 | 400,000 | --- | 650,000 |
|
|
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Compensation Program
The compensation for
Historically, Mr. Salzman consistsserved as the Company’s only executive officer, and his compensation consisted of three elements: base salary, year-end bonus and participation in the Management Incentive Plan. In determining the amount and form of compensation to be awarded to Mr. Salzman, the Board of Directors considered the Company’s overall performance over a period of years, rather than constructing a guideline or formula based on any particular performance measured in a single year. The Board also recognized that Mr. Salzman served in several executive capacities, including Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary.
With Mr. Salzman’s retirement, the Company’s long-serving Controller, Ms. To, was promoted to Chief Financial Officer, and the Company engaged Mr. Myhill-Jones to serve as Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer. Ms. To’s compensation has traditionally consisted of the same elements as Mr. Salzman’s compensation, and this is expected to continue. Salary and bonus payments are primarily designed to reward current and past performance, while awards granted pursuant to the Management Incentive Plan are aimed at providing incentives for long-term future profitability of the Company. In determiningMr. Myhill-Jones’ compensation included only salary and bonus in fiscal 2022, which was his first year with the amount and formCompany. Because the Board anticipates conducting a review of compensation to be paid or awarded in 2017, the compensation committee considered the Company’s overall performance overoverarching compensation model for the future, Mr. Myhill-Jones did not receive any awards under the historic Management Incentive Plan, but it is expected that he will have a period of years, rather than constructing a guideline or formula based on any particular performance measured in a single year. Theperformance-based compensation committee also recognized that Mr. Salzman serves in several executive capacities. Mr. Salzman currently serves as the Company’s chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, treasurer and assistant secretary. In addition, the compensation committee considered the results of the advisory vote held at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting, in which a vast majority of shareholders approved the Company’s executive compensation program, in deciding to maintain the company’s executive compensation program on substantially the same terms as the past several years.opportunity going forward.
Mr. Salzman’sMyhill-Jones’ base salary remainedwas set at an annualized rate of $490,000 with a payment of approximately $250,000 orin fiscal 2022 to reflect his roughly half-year of work for the Company. He also received a pro-rated half-year bonus of $80,000 in fiscal 2022.
Ms. To received a salary of $205,000 and a bonus of $40,000 in fiscal 2022, compared to a salary of $175,000 and bonus of $40,000 in fiscal 2021. This reflects a market-based annual salary adjustment of $25,000 at the end of fiscal 2021 and a mid-year promotional salary adjustment of $10,000 (pro-rated to $5,000 for fiscal 2022).
Mr. Salzman’s base salary for fiscal 2022 was based on an annualized rate of $250,000, which was the same as the annual amounts paid to him in each fiscal year since 1992. The compensation committee believes that the amounts of base salary (which will be continued atMr. Salzman did not receive a bonus in 2022. His bonus in fiscal 2021 was $400,000, which was the same level for fiscal 2018) have been warranted byas the Company’s financial performance, and by Mr. Salzman’s personal performance. While the compensation committee did not undertake a comparison of Mr. Salzman’s compensationannual bonus amount paid to amounts paid by other companies to their chief executive officers, the committee members did utilize in their determination of Mr. Salzman’s compensation their collective current and past experience as directors and executive officers of numerous companies, and their subjective judgments about the performance of the Company and Mr. Salzman in light of the highly competitive market conditions in the publishing and case management software businesses.him historically.
Mr. Salzman’s bonus in each of fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $400,000. The non-equity incentive plan compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table above reflects nothe supplemental compensation payouts to Ms. To and Mr. Salzman under the Management Incentive Plan in each of fiscal 2022 and 2021, based on the Company’s earnings before taxes, workers’ compensation expenses, and supplemental compensation expenses.expenses, realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments and any non-business operating expenses associated with the Board matters.
The Company has no stock option plans, retirement plans, deferred compensation plans disability insurance programs or traditional perquisites (other than health, insurancedental, vision and a life insurance policy,policies, which are offered to all full-time employees). It instead maintainshas maintained the Management Incentive Plan, which is designed to link compensation to the performance of the Company by granting to Mr. Salzman and other participants a percentage of income before taxes and certain(and the other items noted above) in the current year and each of the next nine years subsequent to the grant, provided they continue working for the Company or are retired (and not competing with any of the Company’sCompany’s businesses) and have worked for the Company until age 65. If a participant dies while any of his or her certificates remain outstanding, future payments under those certificates will be made to the deceased participant’s beneficiaries. As of September 30, 2017,2022, the Management Incentive Plan had three different kinds of certificates entitling participants to a share of the Company’s earnings related to their core responsibilities. Participants who work in the Company’s traditional publishing business were eligible to receive “Daily Journal Non-Consolidated Certificates,” while those working for Journal Technologies, Inc. were eligible to receive “Journal Technologies Certificates.” Ms. To, Mr. Salzman and other long-term participants if any, with responsibilities for the entire business were eligible to receive “Daily Journal Consolidated Certificates.”Certificates”.
Beginning in fiscal 2015, payouts underIn the Journal Technologies Certificates are calculated based onpast, the pre-tax incomeBoard of Journal Technologies before supplemental compensation expenses, workers’ compensation expenses, intangible amortizations and goodwill impairment, and accrued interest and penalty for uncertain and unrecognized tax positions. The Journal Technologies Certificates also have an addendum which defines how the value of the Certificate will be paid upon a triggering event such as a sale of Journal Technologies or an initial public offering. Also effective in fiscal 2015, the calculation of payouts under the Daily Journal Non-Consolidated Certificates is based on the pre-tax earnings of the traditional publishing business before supplemental compensation expenses, workers’ compensation expenses, financing costs of the non-traditional business activities, intangible amortizations, realized gains or losses on investments and any write-downs of unrealized losses on investments. The calculation of payouts under the Daily Journal Consolidated Certificates has not changed.
The compensation committee recognizes that a significant portion of the compensation paid pursuant toDirectors favored the Management Incentive Plan relates to certificates earned under the Plan in prior years, with future payments entirely dependent on earnings. Certificates are awarded annually on the basis of participant performance. The aggregate supplemental compensation awarded under the Management Incentive Plan to all participants in fiscal 2017 was $268,250. That compares to an aggregate of $271,350 awarded under the plan in fiscal 2016 and $209,515, of which $10,000 was for the Journal Technologies Certificates, in 2015. Mr. Salzman did not receive any payment pursuant to his Certificates for fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 because the Company as a whole did not have positive pre-tax earnings for the year, as calculated under the Daily Journal Consolidated Certificates, which are the only certificates held by Mr. Salzman.
The compensation committee believes the Management Incentive Plan is preferable toover a conventional stock option plan. As a mechanism for compensation, a stock option plan is capricious, asbecause individuals awarded options in a particular year wouldcould ultimately receive too much or too little compensation for reasons unrelated to their performance. Such variationsperformance, depending on when grants were made and the performance of other aspects of the Company’s businesses. Also, the Board of Directors was concerned that an equity incentive plan could cause undesirable effects, as participants receive different results for options awarded in different years. In addition, a conventional stock option plan would fail to properly weigh the disadvantage to shareholders through dilution. The
Therefore, the cash-based Management Incentive Plan was implemented, in combinationtogether with repurchases of the Company’sCompany’s stock to reduce the dilution to earnings per share caused by grants under the Management Incentive Plan.plan. At September 30, 2017, 92,5002022, 93,000 units for Daily Journal Non-Consolidated Certificates, 256,000651,000 units for Journal Technologies Certificates and 148,000211,000 units for Daily Journal Consolidated Certificates were outstanding under the Management Incentive Plan, while 424,307 shares of the Company’s common stock have been repurchased since the commencement of the Management Incentive Plan. In addition, the Board of Directors is now considering the implementation of a more traditional equity incentive plan based at least in part of the generous gift of 3,720 shares to the Company made by Mr. Munger during fiscal 2022, as that significantly reduces the dilution concern associated with such a plan. The Board of Directors expects to finalize the terms of any new plan during fiscal 2023 as part of an overall review of the Company’s overarching compensation model for the future.
GrantsGiven the long tenures at the Company of Plan-Based Awards during Fiscal 2017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates awarded toboth Ms. To and Mr. Salzman, in earlier yearsa portion of their certificates awarded under the Management Incentive Plan began toin earlier years expire after fiscal 1998, and those certificateseach year. Traditionally, the Company would replace an expiring certificate with an identical certificate, but Mr. Salzman did not receive a replacement certificate in fiscal 2017 were for .66%2022 in light of his retirement. Accordingly, his percentage share of the pre-tax earningsprofits of the Company afterwill decline each year for the last payout of $0 amountnext 8 years as his certificates expire. His interest in the Company’s pre-tax earnings was 7.6% in fiscal 2017. After considering the amount of the certificates previously granted2022 compared to Mr. Salzman, the compensation committee granted Mr. Salzman8.2% in fiscal 2017 a certificate2021.
Ms. To had certificates entitling her to entitle him to receive 1.39%1.1% of the pre-tax earnings of the Company in 20182022 and each of2021, entitling her to $153,500 and $118,750 in those years, respectively. In fiscal 2022, the next nine years, subject to the discretion of the committee to reduce that percentage prior to the first payout for 2018. This essentiallyBoard replaced theMs. To’s expiring certificate with an identical expiring award and maintained Mr. Salzman’s interest in the earnings of the Company at 8.2%, where itcertificate, as has been since fiscal 1997.
The compensation committeethe practice historically, so that she will continue to examine the appropriate amountreceive 1.1% of future grants to Mr. Salzman in light of the Company’s financial performance and the expiration, or expected expiration, of the certificates Mr. Salzman currently holds. Absent substantial changes in Mr. Salzman’s performance or the performance of the Company, the compensation committee’s working assumption is that it will make future grants that maintain Mr. Salzman’s interest in the pre-tax earnings of the Company in fiscal 2023. The Board of Directors expects to keep Ms. To’s incentive compensation opportunity at approximately 8.2%.the same level going forward, though the elements of her compensation may be subject to change as part of Board’s overall review.
Mr. SalzmanMs. To does not have an employment contract with the Company, nor is heshe otherwise entitled to any sort of special payment in connection with hisher termination or a change in control of the Company. Mr. Myhill-Jones was engaged through an Independent Contractor Agreement between the Company and SMJ Holdings Inc., dated March 28, 2022, which was attached as an exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2022. His agreement provides for a monthly retainer based on the annualized salary noted above and the reimbursement of business-related expenses, but contains no special payment upon termination or a change in control.
Compensation of Directors
Messrs.Mr. Munger Guerin and Salzmanany directors who are Company employees or officers do not receive no feescompensation for servingtheir service on the Company’s Board of Directors. The otherOther non-employee directors each receive a yearly stipend of $5,000. $5,000, which is pro-rated for any partial year of service.
The Company also reimburses directors for travel and other expenses incident to service, but it provides no other compensation or perquisites. Non-employeeNon-officer director compensation for 2017fiscal 2022 is summarized in the following table:
Non-EmployeeFiscal 2022 Non-Officer Director Compensation
Name | Fees earned or paid in cash | All other compensation | Total | |||||||||
Charles T. Munger | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
J.P. Guerin | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Peter D. Kaufman | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 | |||||||||
Gary L. Wilcox | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 |
Name | Fees earned or paid in cash | All other compensation | Total | |||||||||
John Frank | $5,000 | 0 | $5,000 | |||||||||
Mary Conlin | 5,000 | 0 | 5,000 | |||||||||
Peter D. Kaufman (1) | 2,084 | 0 | 2,084 |
(1) Mr. Kaufman served on the Board of Directors until his term expired on February 16, 2022.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained herein with management, and based upon that review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement, which is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Submitted by the members of the compensation committee:
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Company’sCompany’s audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company’s management and has discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU Section 380), as adopted bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T,(the “PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and by the Company’s audit committee charter. The audit committee has received written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence.
Based on this review and these discussions, the audit committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’sCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the last fiscal year. Submitted by the members of the audit committee:committee who participated in the recommendation:
| |
John B. Frank | |
Charles T. Munger |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth as of December 21, 201726, 2022 the names and holdings of those persons known to the Company to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of its Common Stock, the holdings of each director and nominee for director, and the holdings of all directors and executive officers as a group. Each person has sole investment and voting power, except where indicated otherwise.
Beneficial Owner | Amount Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||||||
Charles T. Munger | 50,000 | 3.6 | ||||||
J.P. Guerin | 188,299 | (1) | 13.6 | |||||
The Guerin Family Trust | 138,299 | (2) | 10.0 | |||||
RWWM Inc. | 247,827 | (3) | 17.9 | |||||
Richard D. Esbenshade | 135,097 | (4) | 9.8 | |||||
Gerald L. Salzman | 31,636 | (5) | 2.3 | |||||
Peter D. Kaufman | None | - | ||||||
Gary L. Wilcox | None | - | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (five persons) | 269,935 | (6) | 19.5 |
Beneficial Owner | Amount Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||
| ||||
RWWM Inc. | 251,923 (1) | 18.29% | ||
Peter D. Kaufman, as trustee of certain trusts for the benefit of the Munger family | 131,297 (2) | 9.53% | ||
BlackRock, Inc. | 76,517 (3) | 5.56% | ||
Charles T. Munger | 46,280 | 3.36% | ||
Mary Conlin | 100 | - | ||
John Frank | None | - | ||
Steven Myhill-Jones | None | - | ||
Tu To | None | - | ||
Gerald Salzman | None (4) | - | ||
All directors and executive officers as a group (five persons) | 46,380 | 3.37% |
(1) |
|
(2) | According to a Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18, 2020, Peter D. Kaufman may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of 131,297 shares in his role as trustee of certain trusts for the benefit of the Munger family that hold shares of Company Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13D, Mr. |
(3) | According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF THE COMPANY’S’S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
(Item 2 on the Proxy Card)
The audit committee of the Board of Directors has selected Squar MilnerBaker Tilly US, LLP (“Squar Milner”Baker Tilly”) to serve as the Company’sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2017.2023. A representative of Squar MilnerBaker Tilly is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to make such statements as Squar MilnerBaker Tilly may desire and to answer appropriate questions from shareholders.
Ratification of the appointment of Squar MilnerBaker Tilly as the Company’sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year will require that the votes cast in favor of ratification exceed the votes cast against ratification. Abstentions have no effect on the outcome. Brokers and other nominees have the discretion under applicable rules to vote on the ratification of Squar MilnerBaker Tilly when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner on a timely basis.
If Squar Milner’sBaker Tilly’s appointment is not ratified, the audit committee will considerreconsider whether to retain Squar Milner,Baker Tilly, but still may retain the firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the audit committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the Company’s best interest.
Proxies given without instructions will be voted FOR ratification of Squar MilnerBaker Tilly as the Company’s’s independent accountants.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(Item 3 on the Proxy Card)
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enables the Company’s shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the Company’s overall compensation program for its named executive officers.
The Company is asking shareholders to indicate their support for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as described earlier in this proxy statement in the section titled “Executive Compensation”. Accordingly, at the Annual Meeting, the shareholders are being asked to approve the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as described in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”
This so-called “say on pay” vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company. However, the Board of Directors and the compensation committee value the opinions of the Company’s shareholders, and to the extent there is a significant vote against the Company’s named executive officer compensation program, the compensation committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address the reasons behind the vote.
Approval of the resolution will require a vote in favor of the resolution from a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. An abstention is the equivalent of an “against” vote, but broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome.
Proxies given without instructions will be voted FOR the resolution approving the Company’s executive compensation.
ADVISORY VOTE ONTHE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
(Item 4 on the Proxy Card)
The Dodd-Frank Act also enables the Company’s shareholders to indicate every six years how frequently the Company should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. By voting on this proposal, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer such an advisory vote once every one, two or three years.
Previously, at the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders elected to hold this advisory vote on executive compensation every three years. The Board of Directors has again determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs once every three years is the most appropriate choice for the Company, and therefore the Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders again vote for a three-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation. The Company’s executive compensation program is relatively simple, and largely cash-based. Accordingly, an advisory vote once every three years should be sufficient to provide the Company’s shareholders with the “say on pay” required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
Shareholders may cast their votes on their preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain when casting a vote in response to the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the option of once every one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the preferred frequency with which the Company is to hold a shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules.”
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation selected by the shareholders. However, because this is an advisory vote and not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option chosen by the shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on the outcome.
Proxies given without instructions will be voted in favor of holding the advisory vote on executive compensation once every THREE YEARS.
OTHER MATTERS REGARDING
THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Audit Fees
Squar MilnerBaker Tilly billed aggregate fees of approximately $285,000$252,000 for professional services rendered for audits of the Company’s fiscal 20172022 financial statements, and its internal control over financial reporting, and for the three quarterly reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q for fiscal 2017. Squar Milner10-Q. Baker Tilly billed aggregate fees of approximately $240,000$245,000 for the same services in fiscal 2016 and for the last two quarterly reviews of the Company’s financial statements in fiscal 2016. BDO billed aggregate fees of approximately $28,000 for the first quarterly review of the Company’s financial statements in fiscal 2016.2021.
Audit-Related Fees
“Audit-related fees” include fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and not included in the “audit fees” mentioned above. There were no such fees billedbilled by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly in fiscal 20172022 and 2016 or by BDO in fiscal 2016.2021.
Tax Fees
There were no fees billed by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly in either fiscal 20172022 or 20162021 for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning. The Company’s tax services are performed by a separate outside accounting firm.
All Other Fees
The “audit fees” mentioned above are the only fees billed by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly in fiscal 20172022 and 2016 and by BDO in fiscal 2016.2021.
Pre-Approval Policy
Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, before the Company’sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to render audit or non-audit services, the engagement must be approved by the Company’s audit committee or entered into pursuant to a pre-approval policy. The audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy, and it was previously attached as Appendix C to the Company’s proxy statement dated December 29, 2016.for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The policy requires the audit committee to specifically pre-approve each service that the Company’sCompany’s independent auditor provides to the Company (including audit services, tax services and other services), with the exception of certain audit-related services that do not impair the firm’s independence. Generally, pre-approval under the policy is provided for a period of 12 months and relates to a particular category or group of services. Pre-approval fee levels for all services are also established periodically by the audit committee. To ensure prompt handling of unexpected matters, the chair of the audit committee has been delegated authority under the policy to amend or modify any pre-approved non-audit services and fees, with any such action to be reported to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting. The audit committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor to management or to the Board generally. The policy also contains a list of non-audit services which the Company’s independent auditor is prohibited from providing if the results of those services would be subject to audit procedures during the audit of the Company’s financial statements.
The audit committee pre-approved all services provided by Squar MilnerBaker Tilly during fiscal 2017.2022.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCEREPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and its executive officerofficers and all persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The directors, executive officerofficers and greater than 10% shareholders are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms received by the Company and written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that during fiscal 20172022 all filing requirements were timely satisfied, except that J.P. Guerin filed a late Form 4 on January 31, 2017 with respect to The Guerin Family Trust’s sale of one (1) share of Common Stock on January 18, 2017, and a late Form 4 on March 2, 2017 with respect to The Guerin Family Trust’s sale of one (1) share of Common Stock on February 27, 2017.satisfied.
OTHER MATTERS
Other Business
The Board of Directors does not know of any matter to be presented at the Annual Meeting which is not listed in the notice of Annual Meeting and discussed above. If other matters should come before the meeting, however, the persons named in the form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment.
Cost of Solicitation
The solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting will be made primarily by mail. The Company may reimburse persons holding shares in their names as custodians, nominees, or fiduciaries for expenses they may incur in obtaining instructions from beneficial owners of such shares.
Proposals of Security Holders
It is expected that the Company’s 2019Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting will be held on or about February 13, 2019.14, 2024. Shareholders desiring to submit proposals for action at that meeting will be required to submit them to the Company on or before August 31, 2018.September 1, 2023. Any such shareholder proposal must also be proper in form and substance, as determined in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Shareholders intending to present proposals from the floor of the 20192024 Annual Meeting in compliance with Rule 14a-4 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, must notify the Company of such intentions before November 14, 2018.15, 2023. After such date, the Company’s proxy in connection with the 20192024 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority on the Board to vote on any such proposals.
Annual Report to Shareholders
Enclosed with this Proxy Statement is the Annual Report of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2017.2022.
Additional Information
If any person who was a beneficial owner of Common Stock of the Company on the record date for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders desires additional information, a copy of the Company’s’s Annual Report on Form 10-K will be furnished without charge upon receipt of a written request prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. The request should identify the person requesting the Report as a shareholder of the Corporation as of December 22, 2017.16, 2022. The exhibits of that Report will also be provided upon request and payment of copying charges. Requests should be directed to Mr. Gerald L. Salzman,Michelle Stephens, Secretary, Daily Journal Corporation, 915 E. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
By Order of the Board of Directors | |
Michelle Stephens | |
Secretary |
DATED: December 28, 201730, 2022
PROXY
DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
The undersigned hereby appoints Charles T. Munger J.P. Guerin and Gerald L. SalzmanSteven Myhill-Jones as proxyholders, each with the power to appoint his substitute; hereby authorizes them or anyeither of them to represent and vote as designated below all the shares of common stock of Daily Journal Corporation held of record by the undersigned on December 22, 201716, 2022 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 14, 201815, 2023 or any adjournment thereof; and hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, each dated December 28, 2017.Statement.
1. | Election of four Directors |
Charles T. Munger | ☐ | FOR | ☐AGAINST | |
Mary Conlin | ☐ FOR | ☐ ABSTAIN | ||
John B. Frank | ☐ AGAINST | ☐ ABSTAIN | ||
Steven Myhill-Jones | ☐ FOR | ☐ AGAINST | ☐ ABSTAIN |
Charles T. Munger, J.P. Guerin, Gerald L. Salzman, Peter D. Kaufman, Gary L. Wilcox
(To withhold authority for any individual nominee, strike a line through his name above.)
2. Ratification of appointment of Squar Milner LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2018
2. | Ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly US, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023 |
☐ FOR | ☐ AGAINST | ☐ ABSTAIN |
3.
3. | An advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation |
☐ FOR | ☐ AGAINST | ☐ ABSTAIN |
4. | Advisory vote on frequency of the advisory vote on approval of executive compensation |
☐ ONE YEAR | ☐ TWO YEARs | ☐ THREE YEARS | ☐ ABSTAIN |
5. | In their discretion, the proxyholders are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
(Please sign and date the Proxy on the reverse side)
This Proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this ProxyProxy will be voted FOR the election of each director, FOR proposals 12 and 2.3, and for THREE YEARS in proposal 4. Unless otherwise specified, if cumulative voting is requested in any election of directors, the proxyholders or their substitute may cast an equal number of votes for each nominee for director or cumulate such votes and distribute them among the nominees at the discretion of such proxyholders.
This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Daily Journal Corporation.
Dated: | |||
Signature: | |||
Signature: | |||
| |||
Please sign exactly as name appears. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by | |||
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |